My tutor recommended me to re-edit the final assignment. His critique was mainly about the narrative and wrong English:I did have some trouble following your narrative and your English
subtitles though. Robert also proposed me his structure which I could follow and make the story more clear. Here is the result:
Robert's comment: It's 100% better. Quite professional, flows well and you've put the pieces together coherently. Only a few English errors (during) but these are minor. Well done.
The main Robert's (tutor) critique was about narrative - the story structure. Robert encouraged me to re-edit the story and I agreed after a great phone discussion. I realized that I did not conveyed some issues about the story in original edit. Here is the re-edited version but I was not able to make it within 90 second:
My story is about a person who waits for a call. When he answers the phone he gets bad news.
Storyboard:
Frame 1:
somebody is laying on a bed, looking above.
I wanted here to evoke in viewer question what is happen so I used the
medium close-up shot.
Frame 2: A
telephone shot: close-up of telephone. The shot of telephone shows that maybe
the someone is waiting for a call.
Frame 3:
Someone receiving a call. An extreme close-up frame should give a clear picture
what the call is about. The ECU reveals the feelings of the character.
Frame 4:
Medium close-up or Mid-shot to see result of the call - character's expression.
Frame 5:
Medium close-up: we can see how the character face with information from the call. There can be a drop of tear. 25.08.12
Critically assess your finished
product:
Where
is the tipping point which I mentioned in exercise about how to learn? As usual I am not
satisfied with it :-). I have to admit that when I have draw the storyboard I
thought it will be a good small dramatic sequence. We will see somebody receive
a bad call. We do know what exactly it was about but we see the expression of the
character. I think there is a lack of creativity. Maybe I did try to express
more sadness, I do not know. Maybe I do not like it because I am the actor and
a shyness is enhancing my critical mind, I do not know. I like the receiving
the call (frame3) shot. It tells us nearly without words that the message is
bad just because we see expressions. The film is strong medium to tell the
story without words and I think it will be my intention to try to tell the
stories in this way. I like illustrations which do the same thing. I remember
now that a film Eraserhead by David Lynch has minimum dialogs and the meaning
is build by shots and each audience has their own meaning.
What I have learned: 1. To be carefully what the actor is wearing because in the shots you can see that
on the T-shirt is a name of company.
2.
Frame 4: when I filmed myself I did not realize that behind me is an open door.
The figure is connected to the darkness of the space in door. I do not like it
but I let it be. There would be better contrast if the door would be closed. Using a shallow depth of field could help here also. I like the depth of field which use Stuart. It helps to concentrate
on focused object/subject.
3.
Even I filmed every frame few times (3-4) there were problems to chose suitable moments, e.g. I finish the scene too early, or I was too much blinking or my head was badly placed
in frame.
4.
The sensitivity about my new Rode microphone: when I was cutting the shots I
could not believed that the microphone is so sensitive to record my hungry
belly :-))). 5. Stay close to the story board: I wanted to
add some action into the frames, I mean action like going up, laying down on
bed etc. After I loaded the shots into PC I tried to connect the shots
together. It were those actions in shots which encouraged me to change order of
frames against storyboard. I wanted to have those actions there such as the
character go up to pick up the phone but I have problem to connect it with the
phone shot, so I move the shot of phone before the shot of somebody is lying on
bed to avoid a problem with connection. You can see it in second video on my
blog. When I have read the assignment again and saw the notion try and stay
true to your storyboards I made the sequence again accurate to the storyboard.
I deleted the mentioned actions and connected the shots in order in the
storyboard and it worked. The sequence conveys the same meaning without redundant
actions. It means that the preparation stage is the most important.
6. Frame 5 and a drop of tear: I wanted to
show the sadness by a drop of tear but I
was not able to do it. When the camera was on I did my best but no one tear
reveals. I tried to listen to sad song but nothing helped. 7. Frame 4: I do not like the
composition here. I wanted to have my head on the right side but when I turned
camera on I did not see that I moved a little bit to the left side :-).
Skills: I
need to more explore the framing and angles of camera by studding them in other
films. I still do not know how to use them properly to support different
meaning / feeling. As I discovered I need to strengthen the preparation stage I
need to do more things like notions about angles of camera and actions within
every frame in storyboard.